Everybody in this world has the right to have his own opinion. With Al Gore’s movie, the “An Inconvenient Truth”, people are divided to those who liked it and who didn’t, the problem in my opinion that the most of who didn’t like the movie, are really those don’t like Al Gore or that how Al Gore presents the movie.
As a political leader A. O. Scott, Newi York Times thinks that Al Gore shouldn’t do the movie, and the way that Mr. Gore was presenting as Mr. Scott said he was making fun instead of being serious. When he stopped talking about Al Gore and started to mention the movie or the movie’s idea, he said that the idea should been made as movie but the visual aids are a bit silly but the most of the images are really good. He likes the idea but he doesn’t like that Al Gore is the presenter. (A.O. Scott, New York Times)
Roger Ebert an internet writer, liked the movie and the idea, he was so positive that a political man talked about this serious problem which the world is facing it. He liked how Al Gore showed people how the earth looks like and how it will look like, he liked the pictures and how the movie is supported by dramatic visuals. (R. Ebert, www.rogerebert.com)
In my opinion someone like Al Gore should do the movie, the way he talks and present the problem makes you staring at him and believe each word that he says. I liked that he was sometimes making fun, because the movie is bit long so it needs to make people awake to watch the rest of it. I liked the pictures and the directing, it gave the movie more realty and it shows how important is the problem to them.
Bibliography:
A. O. Scott "Warning of Calamities and Hoping for a Change in 'An Inconvenient Truth'" Www.nytimes.com. 24 May 2006. New York Times..
Roger Ebert . "An Inconvenient Truth." Www.rogerebert.com. 2 June 2006. Chicago Sun-Times..
As a political leader A. O. Scott, Newi York Times thinks that Al Gore shouldn’t do the movie, and the way that Mr. Gore was presenting as Mr. Scott said he was making fun instead of being serious. When he stopped talking about Al Gore and started to mention the movie or the movie’s idea, he said that the idea should been made as movie but the visual aids are a bit silly but the most of the images are really good. He likes the idea but he doesn’t like that Al Gore is the presenter. (A.O. Scott, New York Times)
Roger Ebert an internet writer, liked the movie and the idea, he was so positive that a political man talked about this serious problem which the world is facing it. He liked how Al Gore showed people how the earth looks like and how it will look like, he liked the pictures and how the movie is supported by dramatic visuals. (R. Ebert, www.rogerebert.com)
In my opinion someone like Al Gore should do the movie, the way he talks and present the problem makes you staring at him and believe each word that he says. I liked that he was sometimes making fun, because the movie is bit long so it needs to make people awake to watch the rest of it. I liked the pictures and the directing, it gave the movie more realty and it shows how important is the problem to them.
Bibliography:
A. O. Scott "Warning of Calamities and Hoping for a Change in 'An Inconvenient Truth'" Www.nytimes.com. 24 May 2006. New York Times.
Roger Ebert . "An Inconvenient Truth." Www.rogerebert.com. 2 June 2006. Chicago Sun-Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment